Legal Opinion

Hindman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 20, 2017No. 16-257Published

1Opinion of the Court

5 U.S.C. § 5305 (Special Rates Of Pay);

5 U.S.C. § 5596 (Back Pay Act);

5 U.S.C § 5754 (Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004, Retention Bonuses);

28 U.S.C. § 1491 (Tucker Act Jurisdiction);

5 C.F.R §§ 530.301-309 (Special Rates of Pay)

5 C.F.R. §§ 575.301-314 (Retention Incentives);

Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6). .

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Chief Judge.

I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 1

On January 3, 2010, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) hired Nicholas Hindman and assigned him to the Edward Hines Jr. VA…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API