Whittlesey v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Christopher Whittlesey has appealed from a sentence imposed after a forgery conviction. 1 As a commercial fisherman, he had forged numerous fish ticket receipts in 1977, resulting in substantial losses to a fish processor.
The sentence in the case was initially meted out by the sentencing judge at a hearing held on July 9, 1979, some two years after the offense. The oral rendition of sentence was reduced to a written judgment on that same day. An amended judgment, altering the sentence, was entered on August 2, 1979. Each of the three statements of the sentence is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Padie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Boyne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Nattrass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Wharton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Charles v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. LaneMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Qualle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- Langton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.