Legal Opinion

Whittlesey v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1980No. 5155PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Christopher Whittlesey has appealed from a sentence imposed after a forgery conviction. 1 As a commercial fisherman, he had forged numerous fish ticket receipts in 1977, resulting in substantial losses to a fish processor.

The sentence in the case was initially meted out by the sentencing judge at a hearing held on July 9, 1979, some two years after the offense. The oral rendition of sentence was reduced to a written judgment on that same day. An amended judgment, altering the sentence, was entered on August 2, 1979. Each of the three statements of the sentence is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Padie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Boyne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Nattrass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Wharton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Charles v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. LaneMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  3. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Qualle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  5. Langton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API