Jobe v. City of Erlanger
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
The appellants are resident freeholders in an area of some 350 acres proposed to be annexed by the City of Erlanger, a third-class city. They have undertaken to appeal from a judgment of the circuit court, in a remonstrance suit, upholding the annexation.
The statute governing annexation by third-class cities, KRS 81.190(4), provides that there shall be no appeal from the judgment of the circuit court in a remonstrance suit. There is a similar denial of an appeal in the statute relating to annexation by fifth-class cities, KRS 81.230(3), but an appeal is permitted by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mannini v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Lenox Land Co. v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Yount v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. City of Silver GroveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Louisville Shopping Center, Inc. v. City of St. MatthewsKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
- Corn v. City of Windy HillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1975
- Miracle v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
- Hallahan v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967