Legal Opinion

Jobe v. City of Erlanger

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 8, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

The appellants are resident freeholders in an area of some 350 acres proposed to be annexed by the City of Erlanger, a third-class city. They have undertaken to appeal from a judgment of the circuit court, in a remonstrance suit, upholding the annexation.

The statute governing annexation by third-class cities, KRS 81.190(4), provides that there shall be no appeal from the judgment of the circuit court in a remonstrance suit. There is a similar denial of an appeal in the statute relating to annexation by fifth-class cities, KRS 81.230(3), but an appeal is permitted by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mannini v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  2. Lenox Land Co. v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Yount v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  4. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  5. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. City of Silver GroveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Louisville Shopping Center, Inc. v. City of St. MatthewsKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Corn v. City of Windy HillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1975
  3. Miracle v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
  4. Hallahan v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API