PPG Industries v. BD. OF FINANCE & REVENUE
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Saylor
The Commonwealth opens its brief with a detailed argument that an incorrect assumption clouded this Court’s initial determination that the manufacturing exemption in Pennsylvania’s scheme of capital stock/franchise taxation facially discriminates against interstate commerce. See PPG Industries, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 567 Pa. 565, 790 A.2d 252 (1999)(“PPG I”). Specifically, the Commonwealth asserts as follows:
In its interim decision of June 17,1999, this Court held that, as it had been applied to PPG’s headquarters, the manufacturing exemption in 72 P.S. § 7602 discriminated against interstate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fulton Corp. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. TullySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.