Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. State
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1972PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.
New York State and New York City are on opposite sides and in sharp conflict on this motion, each advocating laudable policy objectives which have come into collision. The State wants to build a public facility without let or hindrance, cutting through all “ red tape ”. The city wants to preserve existing historic buildings and landmarks, and save them from the bulldozer. Both focus on the same site.
The State of New York through its agencies, the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission and the Mental Hygiene Improvement Corporation, seeks to construct a narcotics addiction treatment facility in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Powelton Civic Home Owners Ass'n Ex Rel. Hilburn Harbidge v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Psaty v. DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Psaty v. DuryeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Tomlinson Construction Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In Re Advisory Opinion to the House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
- Montgomery v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Police Benevolent Ass'n of the New York State Police, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.