Legal Opinion

State v. Ybarra

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2010No. 28,829PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Judge.

{1} In this DWI case, Defendant consented to a chemical test and provided one sample that resulted in a reported breath alcohol value. Because the officer believed that Defendant may have had physical difficulty completing the breath test, the officer terminated the test, and used the result of the single completed sample to prove Defendant’s intoxication. The applicable standard requires that a test subject be “physically incapable of consent” before the test may be terminated. Terminating a breath test and using the result from the single completed sample must be based…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Santillanes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. UriosteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BoeglinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. JojolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodarte v. Presbyterian Insurance Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Rodarte v. Presbyterian Ins. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Rodarte v. Presbyterian Insurance Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. Garcia PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API