Rodarte v. Presbyterian Insurance Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} This case requires us to determine whether certain medical treatment is covered by a plan participant’s health benefits plan or required by applicable regulations governing such contracts. After Albert Rodarte’s (Rodarte) daughter, Jessica, suffered a severely disabling anoxic brain injury, he sought pre-approval ¡from her health insurance company for Jessica to receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Presbyterian Insurance Company (Presbyterian) denied the request, concluding that the treatment was not a covered benefit. On review, the New Mexico Superintendent of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Rummel v. Lexington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodarte v. Presbyterian Ins. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010