Legal Opinion

Paratore v. Furst

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1969No. Docket 1,977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants Carl Paratore and Robert Hawkins appeal a jury verdict of no cause of action against Paratore and awarding Hawkins $350. Although there are several assignments of error, our disposition of this case makes it unnecessary for us to consider more than one.

This action was commenced following a collision between an automobile driven by Paratore, in which Hawkins was a passenger, and an automobile driven by the defendant Richard A. Furst.

Paratore and Hawkins filed their complaint on May 29,1963. The defendant’s answer did not claim that either plaintiff was guilty of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. GessingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Felice v. WeinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Watts v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Taylor v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. James v. DixonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Obermiller v. PatowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Ureche v. HolbrookMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API