Becker v. Rute
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentMiller, J.
(dissenting) — I am unable to concur with the views expressed by the majority, and respectfully dissent.
The majority opinion recognizes that the notice of .election and forfeiture, whereby the appellee terminated the lease and took immediate possession of the premises, in- legal effect ae complished what its terms expressed, namely, a forfeiture was effected and the lease was terminated by the service of such notice. I agree with the result so far reached. What I am unable to agree with is the holding that the landlord is entitled to possession, after terminating the lease, and is also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reiger v. TurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Clark v. StrohbeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Ingram v. DaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Conner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.