State ex rel. Young v. Village of Harris
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon information of the attorney general the supreme court issued its writ of quo warranto directed to the Village of Harris and the officers of said village. To their answer the state demurred.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Quo warranto, upon the relation of the attorney general, to determine the validity of the proceedings to incorporate the village of Harris, in Chisago county. The admitted facts are that the village was incorporated in 1887 under chapter 145, p. 148, Laws 1885, and included territory six miles in length and from three to four miles in width, containing altogether twenty six sections: About eighty acres of this tract was platted, and the only nucleus or collection of houses within the entire territory was upon the platted portion, which at that time contained a population of about one hundred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Moloney v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Brown v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. LeathermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
- State v. Minnetonka VillageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Jameson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jordan v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Bales v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- City of Winter Haven v. State Ex Rel. LandisSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Aetna Ins. v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Wah-We-Yea-Cumin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.