Legal Opinion

King v. Morris

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 18, 1907PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 44 Vroom 279.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

This action was brought by Charles S. King, as trustee in bankruptcy for Justice C. Paschall, the bankrupt, to recover damages from Artemesia Morris for the taking of a frame factory building and the machinery and fixtures therein, alleged to have been the property of the said bankrupt.

The declaration, as amended, contained a count in replevin and also a count in trover. The defendant demurred to the declaration upon the ground that these two counts were misjoined.

The plaintiff afterwards gave notice of a motion to strike out this demurrer as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wells v. BanisterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Curtiss v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
  3. Fischer v. Johnson Lane & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Brown v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Killian v. HubbardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kay County Gas Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Julia Nicholson v. Altona Corporation, and v. I. Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  4. Connolly v. McLeodMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Albanese v. IndelicatoUnited States District Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API