Brown v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Madison Circuit Court. — Hon. James D. Eos, Judge. (1) The supreme court alone has jurisdiction of this appeal, the amount in controversy and claimed by the appellants being largely in excess of $2,500, and the title of real estate (the fixtures in question) being ■directly in issue. Const. 1875, art. 6, sec. 12; Gerke v. Gerke, 100 Mo. 237; State ex rel. v. Lewis, 96 Mo. 146; Co. v. Guggemos, 24 Mo. App. 144; Willi v. Lucas, 40 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Madison Circuit Court. — Hon. James D. Eos, Judge. (1) The supreme court alone has jurisdiction of this appeal, the amount in controversy and claimed by the appellants being largely in excess of $2,500, and the title of real estate (the fixtures in question) being ■directly in issue. Const. 1875, art. 6, sec. 12; Gerke v. Gerke, 100 Mo. 237; State ex rel. v. Lewis, 96 Mo. 146; Co. v. Guggemos, 24 Mo. App. 144; Willi v. Lucas, 40 Mo. App. 70; Gardner v. Terry, 99 Mo. 523; Searen v. Blackwell, 40 Mo. App. 625; Bunn v. Miller, S6 Mo. 324. (2) Under the claims made in the motion to…
1Opinion of the CourtGabtt, P. J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court of Madison county, on the motion for the assessment of damages on the injunction bond, given by appellees, in the proceedings to recover the value of permanent improvements, wherein the judgment was rendered for appellants and the injunction dissolved, which judgment has been affirmed by this court.
After the ejectment suit of Pool v. Brown, 98 Mo. *132675, bad been decided adversely to tbe defendants, they commenced tbeir action under tbe statute to recover tbe value of tbeir improvements and gave bond and obtained an injunction to stay…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Thomas v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
- Hines v. AmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Pool v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Strickland v. ParkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Springfield Foundry & Machine Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Millis v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Kay County Gas Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Connolly v. McLeodMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.