Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Pouso v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1991Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Balletta, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to modify the order appealed from, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof which denied the appellants’ motions for summary judgment and substituting therefor provisions granting those motions, with the following memorandum in which Eiber, J., concurs: The majority would establish ownership of property alone as the predicate for liability under the Labor Law. However, in my view, neither case law nor a review of legislative intent can support such a proposition.

When is an owner of real property not an owner subject to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Copertino v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Nagel v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Celestine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Celestine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API