Goldstein v. Barak Construction
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
Barak Construction (Barak) and Ami Weisz (sometimes hereafter appellants) appeal from (1) the trial court’s order granting the application of respondents Anita Goldstein and Eric Mizrahi for a right to attach order and order for issuance of writ of attachment against Barak and (2) its order directing Weisz not to “sell, encumber, or diminish the value of his residence” until the action is adjudicated or upon further order of the court. We affirm.
FACTS 1
Respondents own a residence in Los Angeles, California. In June 2004, Weisz represented to respondents that he was personally…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Consolidated Irrigation District v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Alatriste v. Cesar's Exterior Designs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- White v. CridlebaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- E. J. Franks Construction Inc. v. SahotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Vfs Financing, Inc. v. Chf Express, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.