Legal Opinion

In Re Matter of Ackah

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 2017No. COA16-829PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We hold that the HOA's notice to Ms. Ackah of the proceeding before the Clerk did not satisfy the requirements of Rule 4 of our Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, we conclude that Ms. Ackah was entitled to some form of relief from the Clerk's order which had authorized the public sale of her Property.

However, the superior court was constrained by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-108 from granting a form of relief to Ms. Ackah which affected the title of the Jones Family's-a good faith purchaser at the judicial sale ordered by the Clerk-to the Property. That is, by enacting G.S. 1-108, the General…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. England v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Sutton v. . SchonwaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Harrison v. . HargroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Matter of on GeorgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Cty. of Mecklenburg v. RyanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. Cty. of Mecklenburg v. RyanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. In Re Matter of on GeorgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. In re Foreclosure of AckahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API