Beddis v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge BROBSON.
Petitioner Rosemarie A. Beddis (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), affirming a Referee’s determination that Claimant was not eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law) 1 because she voluntarily severed her employment with Saint Grobain Abrasives (Employer) “without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.” Concluding that the Board’s decision is faithful to precedent interpreting Section 402(b) of the Law, we affirm the Board’s order.
Following…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vann v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Campbell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Bennett v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Johnson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Renda v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Diehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (ESAB Group, Inc.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Smithley v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Aversa v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Earnest v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Sweeney v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.