Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harris v. Hanson Industries & Travelers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1994No. CA 93-466Published

1Dissent

James R. Cooper,

dissenting. I dissent because I believe, that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that Dr. Yocum’s treatment resulted from an unauthorized change of physician. In my view, reasonable minds could, on this record, conclude only that Dr. Yocum’s treatment followed a valid referral.

We have held that a request for a referral from a treating physician does not constitute a change of physician so long as the request does not result from “doctor shopping.” TEC v. Underwood, 33 Ark. App. 116, 802 S.W.2d 481 (1991). Furthermore, in White v. Lair Oil Co.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. TEC v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  2. White v. Lair Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API