Legal Opinion
Bashara v. Black Hills Corp.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 23, 1993No. Civ. No. 92-5086Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BOGUE, Senior District Judge.
Defendant Black Hills Corporation (BHC) has moved for summary judgment, asserting that plaintiff has nothing but his own subjective opinion on which to base his claim that his discharge violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). After a careful review of all materials that have been submitted, applicable law, and the entire file in this matter, this Court finds that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Factual Background
In accord with summary judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.