Legal Opinion

Bolick v. Commonwealth

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2013PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

Thomas Bolick [“Appellant”] appeals pro se the trial court’s January 26, 2012 order denying his “Motion to Vacate the Part of this Nunc Pro Tunc Judgment Dated September 29, 2009 That is Void and Reinstate the Valid Unappealed Final Order Which Was Rendered June 25, 2007.” We affirm.

We previously summarized the facts underlying this appeal, as follows:

*1268In 1981, Appellant was convicted of burglary, for which he received a sentence of 2.5 to 10 years’ imprisonment. Since that time, Appellant has filed numerous appeals and petitions challenging that conviction.1 On March 18,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Lal v. Borough of Kennett SquareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Winpenny v. WinpennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Bolick v. Commonwealth of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coulter, J. v. Lindsay, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Angino & Rovner, PC v. Santander BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Bhargava, I. v. Lou's TowingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Adams, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Brown, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API