Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Wetz

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1904No. 1309PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Comal County.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Third District, as follows:

“Appellee brought suit in the Justice Court of Precinct Ho. .1, Comal County, to recover for damages alleged to have been sustained by him on account of the failure of appellant to erect and maintain cattle-guards at the points where its railroad entered the inclosure of appellee, in accordance with article 2533 of the Revised Statutes of Texas.
“Upon appeal to the District Court of said county, which had jurisdiction of said case, appellee recovered • judgment for $175, from which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calcasieu Lumber Co. v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Houston, East & W. Tex. R'y Co. v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Fort Worth & D. S. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. City of Galveston v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WetzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API