Legal Opinion
City of Galveston v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 11, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 65-H-594PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGBAHAM, District Judge:
The ports of Houston and Galveston and four of the original twenty-six defendant railroads seek to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered in Nueces County Navigation District No. 1 v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, et al., 325 I.C.C. 400 (1965). The order held that the export rates for cotton from specified origins in northern Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico were unduly prejudicial to the port of Corpus Christi and unduly preferential to the ports of Houston and Galveston, in violation of Section 3(1) of the Interstate Commerce…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harborlite Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Southern Pacific Transportation Co., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978