Legal Opinion

Goldenberg v. Seime

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1993No. 1—91—1583Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Plaintiff Maurice Goldenberg filed a civil action for money not in excess of $2,500, procedures for which action are determined by Supreme Court Rules 281 through 288 relating to small claims (134 Ill. 2d Rules 281 through 288). The trial court entered judgment against plaintiff and he now appeals that order.

Defendant Jonathan Eric Seime was never served and is not a part of this action. Defendant Katharine M. Nielsen did not file an answer denying plaintiff’s allegations but did file a written response entitled “Affirmative Defenses” asserting two affirmative defenses.

At trial, plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ryan v. BeningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Darwin Co. v. SweeneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Peoria Housing Authority v. RobersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Shankland v. LangAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API