Legal Opinion

Darwin Co. v. Sweeney

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1982No. 4-82-0115PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Londrigan

The plaintiff sued defendant to recover the cost of repair work that plaintiff performed on defendant’s home. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff had not established its corporate existence. The motion was granted and plaintiff appeals from this ruling. We reverse and remand.

The plaintiff is a home improvement contractor in Jacksonville. Plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant for repair of the overhang and installation of new gutters on her home. The work was subsequently completed, but according to defendant, it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wroclawski v. WaszczykAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Ramsey v. Peoria Marine & Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Peoria Housing Authority v. RobersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Wheatley, Buck & Co. v. Chicago Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mid-City Industrial Supply Co. v. HorwitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. A.A. Store Fixtures Co. v. ShopiroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Ealy v. PeddyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Bouhl v. GrossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API