Legal Opinion

Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 12, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This action under section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S. *391C. § 78p(b), which gives a right of recovery of “short swing” profits made by insiders, was tried before me. After trial I filed an opinion, D.C., 132 F.Supp. 100, in which I held that plaintiff had made prima facie proof that defendant Graham-Paige Motors Corporation had made a profit of $434,787.86 on a short swing purchase and sale of stock of defendant Kaiser-Frazer Corporation. I further held, however, that plaintiff had not only the burden of making prima facie proof of profit by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westchester County Park Commission v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Truncale v. BlumbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Stella Ex Rel. Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Truncale v. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adler v. KlawansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Adler v. KlawansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Slaughter v. Philadelphia National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. Michael Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API