State v. Brownlow
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered June 5, 1915, upon a trial and conviction of'-grand larceny.-
1Opinion of the CourtBausman, J.
Appellant, convicted of grand larceny, presents as a first grievance the lower court’s admitting her confession made to a police officer during arrest and in jail. The confession was properly admitted. It was not necessary to remind her that she was under arrest, that she was not obliged to reply, and that her answers would be used against her. There was no inducement, fear, or threat. The state*583ment was voluntary. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2151 (P. C. 135 § 1151) ; State v. Barker, 56 Wash. 510, 106 Pac. 133; State v. Royce, 38 Wash. 111, 80 Pac. 268; State v. Wilson, 68 Wash. 464, 123 Pac. 795.
Test…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. RoyceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. MedlockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. DildineWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Sparks v. GallagherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- State v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.