Legal Opinion

United States v. Holland-America Line

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 14, 1956No. 23695_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, the United States, brought this suit for reimbursement of the expense of deporting an alien allegedly imported from England on a vessel belonging to the defendant, LIolland-Amcrica Line. Upon the pleadings, affidavits, and records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the District Court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff.

The government’s claim is based on Section 20 of the Immigration Act of 1917, formerly 8 U.S.C. § 156, 1 which, in pertinent part, reads as follows:

“The deportation of aliens provided for in this chapter shall, at the option…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lloyd Sabaudo Societa Anonima Per Azioni v. EltingSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States Ex Rel. Karamian v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. United States Ex Rel. Di Paola v. ReimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Seif v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. United States Ex Rel. Mazur v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Milanovic's PetitionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. United States v. Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. OBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
  4. Servaas & Co. v. DritzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. United States ex rel. Milanovic v. MurffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API