Legal Opinion
Central Transport, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Area Pension Fund
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 5, 1986No. CIV-2-85-470PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HULL, Chief Judge.
This action came before the Court for a hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The Court has carefully considered the record and the oral arguments made by counsel and finds that the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is well taken for the reasons hereinafter set out.
The plaintiffs, Central Transport, Inc., et al, contend that since their purchase of Mason and Dixon Lines stock was contingent upon ICC approval pursuant to the provisions of both their stock purchase agreement and 49 U.S.C. § 11343, they did not own or control Mason and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Challenge Stamping And Porcelain CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Mid-America Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Mid-America Industries, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1972
3Cited by11 opinions
- Board Of Trustees Of Trucking Employees Of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.--Pension Fund v. CentraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. CentraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Banner Industries, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Findlay Truck Line, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- The Mason And Dixon Tank Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.