Legal Opinion

State v. Keith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1976No. 52238PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this case, the trial court sustained the defendant’s motion to suppress solely because of the refusal of the state to disclose the identity of a confidential informant whose information furnished the grounds for probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant. In sustaining the motion the trial court heard no evidence. Held:

As a general rule, the public policy of this state supports the nondisclosure of the identity of an informant on whose information a search is based. Code § 38-1102; Chancey v. Hancock, 233 Ga. 734 (213 SE2d 633). Whether, as an exception to this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scull v. THE STATECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Estevez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Chancey v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API