Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Kelso

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2013No. WD 74134Published

1Concurrence

LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm Kelso’s conviction for first-degree child molestation. However, I write separately to address the sole issue raised in Kelso’s appeal. Kelso contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove that he caused the victim to touch his genitals “through the clothing,” insofar as a condom does not constitute “clothing.” Because I conclude that touching through a condom is touching through the clothing for purposes of sexual contact as defined in Section 566.010(3), I see no need…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. State v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API