Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Fink (In re Copeland)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2012No. BAP No. 12-6034PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHERMER, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtors, Shawn C. Copeland and Lauren M.K. Copeland (the “Debtors”), appeal from the order of the bankruptcy court1 confirming their amended Chapter 13 plan. We have jurisdiction over this appeal from the final judgment of the bankruptcy court. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(b). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
ISSUE
The issue in this appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred when it confirmed the Debtors’ amended Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan (over the Debtors’ objection) that did not provide for payment of unsecured non-priority tax claims and tax preparation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gary D. Hanson, Sandra Kay Hanson v. First Bank of South Dakota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Zahn v. FinkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In Re SaulterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991
- Mickelson v. Leser (In re Leser)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Groves v. LaBarge (In re Groves)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re KnowlesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Copeland v. Fink (In Re Copeland)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014