Legal Opinion

State v. Lyford

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1930No. 6,649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

The defendant was convicted of grand larceny. His motion for a new trial was overruled, and he appealed from the judgment.

The information, as amended without objection at the time of the trial, described the subject of the larceny as “one white-faced yearling steer, branded with the brand P S on the left hip, * * * then and there being owned by and the property of Peter Scheffer.”

The evidence introduced by the state shows that defendant in July and August, 1929, was employed by S. Manheimer as foreman on the latter’s ranch in Missoula county; defendant was to receive certain wages and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BoltonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. CobbMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Olson v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. JenkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. BroellMontana Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BubnashMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. McComasMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. BubnashMontana Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API