Legal Opinion

Peninsula Guardians, Inc. v. Peninsula Health Care District

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 2011No. A126056Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JENKINS, J.

Peninsula Guardians, Inc. (plaintiff), an incorporated public interest group, filed an amended complaint alleging defendant Peninsula Health Care District (District) made campaign expenditures prohibited by Stanson v. Mott (1976) 17 Cal.3d 206 [130 Cal.Rptr. 697, 551 P.2d 1] (Stanson), in connection with a ballot measure that authorized the construction of a new hospital. In a prior appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s other claims related to the hospital project, but remanded to allow plaintiff to amend its complaint to assert a Stanson claim. (See…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Keller v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Vargas v. City of SalinasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API