Peninsula Guardians, Inc. v. Peninsula Health Care District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JENKINS, J.
Peninsula Guardians, Inc. (plaintiff), an incorporated public interest group, filed an amended complaint alleging defendant Peninsula Health Care District (District) made campaign expenditures prohibited by Stanson v. Mott (1976) 17 Cal.3d 206 [130 Cal.Rptr. 697, 551 P.2d 1] (Stanson), in connection with a ballot measure that authorized the construction of a new hospital. In a prior appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s other claims related to the hospital project, but remanded to allow plaintiff to amend its complaint to assert a Stanson claim. (See…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Keller v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Vargas v. City of SalinasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.