Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 8, 1985No. 05-84-00043-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARVER, Justice.

Charles Augustine Hawkins appeals his conviction for unlawful possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, namely, Pentazocine. Trial was before the court without a jury, and punishment, twice enhanced, was assessed by the trial court at twenty-five years imprisonment. In his single point of error, Hawkins asserts that there is insufficient evidence to prove intent to deliver the Pentazocine. We disagree and affirm Hawkins’ conviction.

Lawrence Cummings, an undercover narcotics officer, and Steven Scholl, the arresting officer, testified on behalf of the State.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. United States v. Juan Octavio Pena GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Branch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Turner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Branch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API