Crunk v. Crunk
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Harrison. Tried below before the Hon. W. W. Morris. Motion by the plaintiffs in error to continue the case; and that citations issue to those defendants in error, not served with the process issued from the District Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This case seems to have been brought into this court, before service on all of the defendants in error, under the apprehension, that the remedy by writ of error would be barred by further delay. Motion is made to perfect service, by a citation from this court, to be served on the defendants not served with the citation which issued from the District Court.
The case of Spann et al. v. French, 13 Texas Rep. 91, is cited as authority for such proceeding. That case was overruled by the case of Chambers v. Shaw, 16 Texas Rep. 143, wherein it is held, that the citation in error, issued by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chambers v. ShawTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Spann v. FrenchTexas Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Employers Casualty Co. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Thompson, Morris & Co. v. Pine & PoindexterTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Adams v. BidaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Cruz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Hunter v. NicholsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.