Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Conaway

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 2002PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMusmanno, J.

¶ 1 Appellant Raymond Conaway (“Con-away”) appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following his conviction of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. 1 We affirm.

¶2 The pertinent facts and procedural history of this case are as follows. On February 8, 2001, a jury found Conaway guilty of the above-mentioned offenses. The jury also found co-defendant Glennat-ta Conaway (“Glennatta”), Conaway’s sister, guilty of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, and unlawful…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. RamosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. HutchinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Com. v. Abram, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Artis-Bryan, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API