Legal Opinion

Othenin v. Theimer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 11127PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This action was on account for material furnished and labor performed. A verdict was returned and judgment rendered for plaintiffs in the lower court. Defendant appealed the case here, assigning a number of errors, all of which, except one, relate to the admission of alleged improper evidence. Such assignments of error require an examination of all the evidence introduced at the trial. The case-made does not purport to contain all the evidence; therefore, these questions cannot be reviewed. Scottish Union & Mutual Ins. Co. v. Chicago. R. I. & P. R. Co., 38 Okla. 164, 132 Pac. 674.

The error…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thorp v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Leger Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Scottish Union & Mutual Ins. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. CoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. Tulsa Terrazzo & Mosaic Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API