Legal Opinion

Stokes v. McDowell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1967No. 38713PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stafford, J. † —

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. The trial court held that Mamie Hatcher McDowell was entitled to the proceeds of a civil service retirement policy on the life of Ellis Hatcher, her former husband. The appellants are James F. Hatcher, intervenor and Charles Stokes, administrator for the estate of Ellis Hatcher.

Ellis and Mamie Hatcher were married in 1948. During the marriage Ellis Hatcher earned a retirement benefit from the United States Civil Service. In 1950 Ellis Hatcher designated the beneficiaries of his policy as follows:

“Mamie L. Hatcher, if living,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. United Benefit Life Insurance v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. California-Western States Life Insurance v. JarmanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Cowan v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. DeRuwe v. DeRuweWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Lynch v. BogenriefSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Harris v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Beneficial Life Insurance Company v. StoddardIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API