Legal Opinion
United States v. Neal R. Bruckman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 9, 1989No. 88-1035PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FUSTE, District Judge.
Appellant-defendant Neal R. Bruckman (“Bruckman”) appeals his conviction after jury verdict on twenty-five counts of mail fraud under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341. The indictment alleged that Bruckman and others schemed to defraud various persons and entities by inducing them to enter into business combinations with Aetna Properties, Inc. (“Aetna”) and Oxford Capital Corp. (“Oxford”). The scheme was carried out in part through the use of fraudulent financial statements for Aetna and Oxford. Such statements were mailed in the course of the intended…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-MarquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Dominic L. Serino, United States of America v. John L. CloseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Paul J. SavoieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Claude Paul TardiffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Perry A. Graham, United States of America v. Terrence A. Terrell, United States of America v. Roger v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Joseph GeranteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Marrero-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.