Legal Opinion
United States v. Claude Paul Tardiff
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 8, 1992No. 91-2040PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Claude Paul Tardiff pled guilty to a 20-count information charging him with numerous acts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1988). At sentencing, the district court fixed the applicable guideline sentencing range (GSR) and imposed an incarcerative sentence at the low end of the range. 1 Defendant appeals. We affirm.
I
Overview
An overview of the facts suffices to put this appeal into workable perspective. The defendant was the proprietor of “CPT Business Services.” In that capacity, he successfully encouraged more than 70 persons to entrust…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. David Sklar, United States of America v. David SklarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. McGillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. MalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. John L. St. CyrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.