Legal Opinion
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. v. Sigray, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 12, 2023No. 5:21-cv-01129Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY, Case No. 5:21-cv-01129-EJD INC., 9 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 SIGRAY, INC., 12 Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff, Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. (“Zeiss”), brings this suit against Defendant, 15 Sigray, Inc., (“Sigray”), for infringement of
U.S. Patent No. 7,057,187
(the “ ’187 Patent”) and 16
U.S. Patent No. 7,400,704
(the “ ’704 Patent”). The parties dispute the proper construction of 17 three terms and have filed briefs in support of their proposed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.