Legal Opinion

University City v. Diveley Auto Body Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1967No. 52069, 52070PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

In separate informations and appeals, consolidated for trial and here, the Diveley Auto Body Company, Inc., was charged with unlawfully maintaining nonconforming signs in violation of the zoning ordinances of University City. Upon trial in the circuit court the appellant was found guilty and assessed a fine of $100.00 and costs in each case, and after its motion for a new trial was overruled perfected its appeal to this court on the theory that they were “cases involving the construction of the Constitution of the United States or of this state.” Const.Mo. Art. 5, § 3,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Domijan v. HarpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Veal v. LeimkuehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. St. Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Bartholomew v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Kansas City v. StricklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Kansas City v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. Boyce Industries, Inc. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Ross v. RobbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API