Legal Opinion
Morrissey v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1997No. 95 Civ. 1374(CBM)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks the production of documents which have been withheld or redacted by defendants on the basis of a variety of privileges. For the reasons stated herein, this motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Stephen Morrissey is a police officer who was in the New York Police Department’s (“NYPD”) 30th precinct during the investigation into its corrupt practices. During these investigations, defendant New York District Attorney’s Office (“District Attorney”) in conjunction with the Internal Affairs Bureau (“IAB”) of defendant NYPD,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In re The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- National Congress for Puerto Rican Rights v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Strougo v. Bea AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Dorsett v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Collens v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.