Legal Opinion

S. Silberstein & Son, Inc. v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The defendants moved for judgment “ as demanded in the answer,” a dismissal of the complaint, “ and more particularly for judgment dismissing the second cause of action ” for insufficiency. The motion was denied and judgment was granted in favor of plaintiff for the relief demanded in the second cause of action.

The second count is an attempt to state a cause of action for relief under the Bulk Sales Act or the Sales in Bulk Act (Pers. Prop. Law, § 44, as amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 507); and it is attacked as faffing to allege that plaintiff was a creditor prior to the transfer of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Apex Leasing Co. v. LitkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Apex Leasing Company v. . LitkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willi v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Elm Coated Fabrics Co. v. Harry Polans Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Freedman v. Baron, Rott & Samuels Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API