State v. Hattabough
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom tlie Washington Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Dissentins Opinion.
Biddle, J.
Upon a careful consideration of the question, I find it impossible to concur in the opinion of the majority of the court in this case, without sacrificing what seems to me to be a judicial duty. The unqualified doctrine, that a conviction or an acquittal of a simple assault and battery before a court of competent jurisdiction to try the same is not a bar to a subsequent prosecution for the same assault and battery with intent to commit a felony, which I understand to be the basis of the majority opinion, is so repugnant to my judgment that I am constrained to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Clem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Weinzorpflin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- State v. ElderIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.