Legal Opinion

Chardon v. Alameda Park Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1934No. Civ. 8743PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The defendant owns and operates for profit a public pleasure resort in Alameda known as Neptune Beach, wherein various forms of entertainment are provided, among them being several different kinds of athletic and amusement devices including swings, horizontal bars, ladders, overhead rings and slides or chutes, as they are sometimes called, all located on a square of ground which has been covered with sand. The plaintiff, while visiting the resort with his wife and a party of children, descended one of the slides, and in landing on the ground below sustained a fractured spine and serious…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Hart v. Washington Park ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Firszt v. Capitol Park Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Kline v. Santa Barbara Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Malone v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Celli v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. McDaniel v. DowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Miller v. Desilu Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Davidson v. Long Beach Pleasure Pier Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API