Legal Opinion
Salopek v. State
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2001No. 00-15004; D.C. No. CV-99-00314-HDMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.
Mark J. Salopek (“Salopek”) does not appeal the district court’s dismissal of his claims against the State of Nevada and John Drew, F.L. Cypher, and Frank Clayton (hereinafter “his supervisors”) in their official capacities on the ground that they were immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. Thus, our review is limited to the district court’s dismissal of Salopek’s claims against his supervisors in their individual capacities.
A. Section 1983 Claims
Salopek’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Draper v. Coeur Rochester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. BeckwithNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Danny Thomas v. Dennis Douglas, and Clarence Dupnik, Pima County, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.