Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-9896

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 12, 1986No. 1 CA-JUV 312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL G. ULRICH, Judge Pro Tern.

The central issue presented for our determination is whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering appellant transferred from juvenile court to stand trial as an adult pursuant to Rule 14, Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court (RPJC). We hold the trial court abused its discretion in ordering appellant transferred and reverse.

FACTS

On July 30, 1985, the Coconino County Attorney filed a delinquency petition in juvenile court charging appellant with two counts of theft, both class three felonies, and two counts of liability as an accomplice to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile No. J-86509Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-93117Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-9896Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-10359Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. In Re the Welfare of K.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Ex Parte JDGSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-9896Arizona Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API