Legal Opinion

Hix v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 1978No. 77-1126-E-2, CA 9566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this Workers’ Compensation case, the sole question is compensability. The claimant, who was sixteen at the time, suffered an injury to his arm while attempting to clear a moving conveyor belt at the Gold Hill Lime Plant. The arm was subsequently amputated. The referee found claimant not to be an employee under ORS 656.005(28) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, which provides:

" 'Workman’ means any person including a minor, whether lawfully or unlawfully employed, who engages to furnish services for a remuneration, subject to the direction and control of the employer * *

The Workers’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckner v. Kennedy's Riding AcademyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. Oremus v. Oregonian Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Cox v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Konell v. KonellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Montez v. Roloff Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Demilly v. Butler Amusements, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API