In Re Klock
California Court of Appeal
1DissentFeinberg, J.
I dissent,as I believe that the petitioner’s waiver of extradition signed in New York was effective because Penal Code section 11177, subdivision (3)1 (a part of the Uniform Act for Out-of-State Probationer or Parolee Supervision (Uniform Compact) (Pen. Code, § 11175 et seq.)) provides an alternative method for the return of a fugitive from justice.
A fugitive is defined as one who, having committed a crime in one state, leaves it and is found in another. (People v. Superior Court (Lopez)* (Cal.App.)) Petitioner is a fugitive. Parole violation is an extraditable offense. (Forester v.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re Pierce v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Eugene Forester v. The California Adult AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.