Legal Opinion

Application of Renato Rogerio Carreira Reynaud

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 14, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7195PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant’s application Serial No. 849,-059, filed October 27, 1959, discloses a union for pipe lines in general as well as for pipes of cement, fiber-cement, plastics, metal or the like. The present appeal involves claim 5, the only claim remaining in the application. While the examiner and the board rejected the claim for various reasons, we think the rejection based on 35 U.S.C. § 103 is determinative and shall consider only this ground.

Rejected claim 5 reads on this structure and describes the asserted invention, as will be seen from the following reproduction of the claim…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tenneco Chemicals, Inc. v. William T. Burnett & Co., Inc., and Reeves Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  2. Sutter Products Company v. Pettibone Mulliken CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  3. Forbro Design Corporation v. Raytheon Company, Forbro Design Corporation v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  4. Blohm & Voss Ag v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  5. Matherson-Selig Co. v. Carl Gorr Color Card, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API